The Ironsteed project

Create your project threads here if you prefer to keep them out of the regular forums

Moderator: Moderators

donoauto
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 2353
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:55 am
Contact:

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by donoauto »

Go it Lee , sounds fully hectik bro. Does it come with twin sub-woofers?
(PRAYER) Oh thank you Wild Turkey American Honey & Cola in those small thin bottles, for giving me the strength to act like a half wit, and say stupid things at inappropriate times, semi-anonymously, on a public forum.
Amen.
donoauto
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 2353
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:55 am
Contact:

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by donoauto »

I too , am a ricer with a WRX. I feel as though I can still stand tall & hold my head up high. Having a Mustang muscle car in the shed is good back up in an argument though.
(PRAYER) Oh thank you Wild Turkey American Honey & Cola in those small thin bottles, for giving me the strength to act like a half wit, and say stupid things at inappropriate times, semi-anonymously, on a public forum.
Amen.
Foresight
Zebras for hire
Zebras for hire
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by Foresight »

We have touched on this breifly but for a road car whats the best setup for a supercharger? Twinscrew or centrifugal?

Having a big block like powercurve sounds good but so does the high rpm rush of the centri.
Cheers,
Lee & Q
69 428 mach 1 - Guess who...it's Q!
S[_]SPECT
Mustang Maniac
Mustang Maniac
Posts: 1261
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:09 pm
Contact:

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by S[_]SPECT »

If you want it to feel different to Q.. F2 ProCharger = Game Over.

If you're serious about supercharging.. take a drive out to York and speak to Mark

Cheers,
Birchy...
Dodgy Bros. Customs

Suspect 67 - http://www.mustangtech.com.au/Forums/vi ... /t=52.html
jusTANG
PatCH the Platypus
PatCH the Platypus
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by jusTANG »

i do like the sound of a nice super charger....mmm got me thinking now lee
Cheers,
j
Foresight
Zebras for hire
Zebras for hire
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by Foresight »

The temptation is hard to resist isnt it justang...just have a look at this chart :poke:

Image
Cheers,
Lee & Q
69 428 mach 1 - Guess who...it's Q!
Foresight
Zebras for hire
Zebras for hire
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by Foresight »

To build an under-stressed supercharged efi V8 are you better off starting from scratch with aftermarket parts or is a motor out of a falcon a more cost effective/ample solution?
Cheers,
Lee & Q
69 428 mach 1 - Guess who...it's Q!
hybrid
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 9354
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:13 pm
Contact:

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by hybrid »

8 PSI is nothing mate.. a stock engine should be fine with that.
ozbilt
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10977
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:30 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by ozbilt »

hybrid wrote:8 PSI is nothing mate.. a stock engine should be fine with that.
Basically that is all the car in my avatar has, stock roller 5.0 with the puffer, goes like stink.
Kerry

To our wives and sweethearts. May they never meet
Foresight
Zebras for hire
Zebras for hire
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by Foresight »

Do you know the numbers the car is pushing kerry?
I'm not looking for a dyno queen but I want to build a car that has usable power on the higher side of life (as Steve said I don't seem to believe in half measures :rotfl:)

I don't have much experience with these cars so I don't know if 300rwhp or 500rwhp is considered usable...

At the moment I am thinking a AU 5.0 with a kenne bell at around 450rwhp.
Cheers,
Lee & Q
69 428 mach 1 - Guess who...it's Q!
nassi
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by nassi »

Foresight wrote: At the moment I am thinking a AU 5.0 with a kenne bell at around 450rwhp.
I reckon that will be more than enough to scare the sh1t out of you on a damp day.
I have a stock 5.0 in my AU III, 220KW or about 300HP at the flywheel, it brakes traction in the dry and manages a 14.6 at the strip but very easy around town.
When yours is finnished can I have a go :drool:
cheers.
Foresight
Zebras for hire
Zebras for hire
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by Foresight »

Sure nassi,we make these cars to drive them dont we :thumbs"
Hopefully the racelogic traction control is as good as they say :poke:
Cheers,
Lee & Q
69 428 mach 1 - Guess who...it's Q!
ozbilt
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10977
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:30 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by ozbilt »

That would be what the one in the avatar has. It has no EGR & an 80mm throttle body from memory, JBA shorties.

Give you an idea, went out in Ron's 351 roller 69 today. It gets to 100mph quickly (by 3rd gear with a 3.25 rear end). It has a 5 speed in it. Engine will go on a dyno as soon as it has a few hundred miles on it, expect about 450hp is in it.

Oh course we were on a private road, not wishing to be in breach of any road laws.... :dance2:
Kerry

To our wives and sweethearts. May they never meet
Foresight
Zebras for hire
Zebras for hire
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:12 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by Foresight »

So do you think with a tweaked suspension setup, serious wheels and traction control (for any rainy days) we could handle some bigger numbers?

Thinking about a gearvendors for the rear to switch between a couple of selected rear ratios
Cheers,
Lee & Q
69 428 mach 1 - Guess who...it's Q!
ozbilt
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 10977
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:30 pm

Re: The Ironsteed project

Post by ozbilt »

Foresight wrote:So do you think with a tweaked suspension setup and traction control (for any rainy days) we could handle some bigger numbers?

Thinking about a gearvendors for the rear to switch between a couple of selected rear ratios
Forget the traction control & learn to drive properly.. :poke:

GV is hardly necessary, go for a run in Ron's car when you come over & you will be impressed with how it goes, esp on the freeway in 5th (about 1900/2000rpm at 115k)
Kerry

To our wives and sweethearts. May they never meet
Post Reply