347 Build

Create your project threads here if you prefer to keep them out of the regular forums

Moderator: Moderators

lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

Hi,

Now I've got my home made stack injection working well on the 289 I've started my 347 Build.

Lots of Pics:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
cage
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 3775
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: 347 Build

Post by cage »

Looks like Xmas.
"The simple answer is, even if I have decided I still don't know what to do."
lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

Many years of smuggling parts into the garage :-)
boofhead
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:33 pm
Contact:

Re: 347 Build

Post by boofhead »

Cage you know the feeling..... I do as well - its great.


Luke, Interesting set of parts. Two things stood out to me
1) Its not bad infact it is great though not necessary for a street engine - so why the shaft rocker assembly? I like to understand your choice.
2) The Cam is a custom grind using XE flat tapped cam profiles - why a flat tappet grind - how did you choose the cam lobes for the grind? Just want to understand your logic applied in the choices.

Every thing looks great - I look forward to more pictures as you build the engine and then put the great home developed 8 Stack on top. What you have done is great so no doubt its going to be fantastic.
I will someday think of something clever to say.
Shaunp
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 4443
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:07 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by Shaunp »

Nice heads cnc Brodix.
lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

The grind was decided by comp cams to suit the injection style and compression ratio. As you know this is a DD so I didn't want to go nuts and end up hating it while sitting in traffic.

The LGM shaft rockers were about the same price as high end conventional stud rockers and I just feel they are more set and forget.
lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

I got the heads from Keith Craft. Notice they were shipped in Edlbrock E Street boxes :-)

Great service but the heads are an unknown quantity as yet.
boofhead
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:33 pm
Contact:

Re: 347 Build

Post by boofhead »

Thanks - nice heads for sure. Makes perfect sense as far as the shaft rockers - very nice choice.

I am on the fence with he Cam choice. It is certainly not what I would have chosen as I would never select a flat tappet cam these days. Having said that, it will be interesting to how it turns out for you.

Bring on the build pictures.
I will someday think of something clever to say.
Shaunp
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 4443
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:07 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by Shaunp »

Those heads will be fine they are similar to what most of the QLD Trans-am cars run.
lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

So the cam is degreed, heads are on, the shaft rockers are spot on in the centre of the valve without shimming.

Now I just need to order some pushrods, and spark plugs and I'll be ready to start the swap.
nassi
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: 347 Build

Post by nassi »

lukep6470 wrote:So the cam is degreed, heads are on, the shaft rockers are spot on in the centre of the valve without shimming.

Now I just need to order some pushrods, and spark plugs and I'll be ready to start the swap.
Since I am unemployed I would like to volunteer to run that little sucker in for you. :like: It all looks a bit tasty. :lol:
lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

nassi wrote: Since I am unemployed I would like to volunteer to run that little sucker in for you. :like: It all looks a bit tasty. :lol:
The instructions that came with the short block from Dart said to use break in oil for 600miles than switch to full synthetic. I plan to do that on the first weekend!!
nassi
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: 347 Build

Post by nassi »

lukep6470 wrote:
nassi wrote: Since I am unemployed I would like to volunteer to run that little sucker in for you. :like: It all looks a bit tasty. :lol:
The instructions that came with the short block from Dart said to use break in oil for 600miles than switch to full synthetic. I plan to do that on the first weekend!!
Perfect................ why delay these things. :lol:
donoauto
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 2353
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:55 am
Contact:

Re: 347 Build

Post by donoauto »

Mmmmmmm Engine Porn.. :drool: :drool:
(PRAYER) Oh thank you Wild Turkey American Honey & Cola in those small thin bottles, for giving me the strength to act like a half wit, and say stupid things at inappropriate times, semi-anonymously, on a public forum.
Amen.
lukep6470
Mustang Star
Mustang Star
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:13 pm

Re: 347 Build

Post by lukep6470 »

So pushrod length.

I've set the pushrod length checker and I get an actual length of 6.100. This is in about the middle of the adjustment range for the rockers.

If I've got this right by the comp cams doco I have the following measurements:

Actual 6.100
Theoretical 6.125
gauge 6.066

From what I can see on the comp cams site their pushrod start at a gauge length of 6.200 which doesn't help me at all.

The shaft rockers have a lot of adjustment in them but I'm unsure if they'll cope with .133" too long.
Post Reply