Header test

Need help on paint, paint prep, welding, engines etc?

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
boofhead
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:33 pm
Contact:

Header test

Post by boofhead »

I tend to like this series - a little simplistic but always illustrates the options
I will someday think of something clever to say.
hybrid
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 9354
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:13 pm
Contact:

Re: Header test

Post by hybrid »

Watched this the other day, no real surprises, but if you were stuck for space, the cast headers don't do too bad - especially if it was on a mild engine.
Ausjacko
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 2367
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:30 pm
Contact:

Re: Header test

Post by Ausjacko »

Yep Boof, I like them as well and they are getting a bit more useful in terms of their comparisons; ie reducing differences in the testing.

Really, unless you are using WOT (which most do not) then the cast headers in this comparison are pretty competitive for a whole host of reasons.
'68 J-code GT Fastback
'67 S-code GT coupe, 'Pink Bitz' formerly known as 'Hookin' up a brother'
'69 M_____ GTS Fastback 'Blasted'
boofhead
Mustang King
Mustang King
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Header test

Post by boofhead »

Yes though do not equate a stock Ford Windsor cast iron header being equal with that trick cast hooker product. Look how smooth it is with good sized internal with some length runners etc. The ford product is crap in comparison.
I will someday think of something clever to say.
Post Reply